In light of the fact that the new Willow sequel series premiered on Disney Plus, I thought it would be a good time to revisit my recommendation of the original movie. Plus, share some thoughts on the new series.
In brief, I wish the dialogue and the writing were better, because the worldbuilding and art direction are phenomenal. The world of the original Willow was just straight-up weird — and further evidence that George Lucas is a genius Ideas Guy — and what we’ve seen so far of the series makes it clear they’re going to honour that.
Which is good.
On the other hand, it feels like they’re running down the Big List of Fantasy Genre Conventions (they also made me use the word “trope”, something for which I would never have forgiven them) and literally checking things off the list as they go.
Tomboy Princess? Check. Wants to go her own way? Check. Forbidden love? Check. Scary, vaugely-defined evil threat to the world? Check. Chosen One’s our only hope? Check.
I get it. There’s only so many ways to tell a story. But there are at least other ways to tell a story than “Exactly the Same Way Everyone Else Has Ever Told That Exact Story.”
But, like, it’s only been two episodes. There’s still plenty of them for them to start playing with the genre. I just hope that they actually do.
Mostly, though, my biggest complaint is that the characters talk and act like people from 2022 North America, rather than people from an unrepentantly Fantasy-y… Fantasy world. It was glaring and distracting enough that I almost tapped out during the first third of the first episode, but I stuck it out and I feel like it did improve by the end of the second episode.
This is exactly the problem I’ve had with Dragon Age recently.
And, yeah, yeah, Realmgard does that, too, but Willow is infinitely more unironic Fantasy than Realmgard is. Now, Realmgard, isn’t necessarily a parody or a satire, but it is based on the premise of not taking itself or the genre too seriously.
Though I hate the end credits music they’ve been using so far. It’s incongruously modern and they start playing it way too early in the last scenes before the credits actually start. But, honestly, if that’s my biggest ongoing problem, I think the show’s in a good place over all.
On the other hand, Warwick Davis is actually a really good actor, and I think this is the first opportunity I’ve ever had to see that, because I’ve only ever seen him as an Ewok — albeit the Ewok — in bit parts, or in the original Willow, where he was 17 years old and didn’t really have much to work with…
Overall, it’s been two episodes, so I think I’m still at the “cautiously optimistic” phase. And, honestly, I’m probably less down on the whole thing that the above manifesto may indicate. There have been at least a few moments of genuine entertainment and hilarity.
For what it’s worth, it’s currently at 5.3 on IMDB, and that strikes me too harsh. I’d probably put it at a high 6-point-something up to a mid 7-point-something.
But, again, it’s only been two episodes, so it’s hard to really judge it substantially.
So, let’s move on to the original movie.
First things first, take a gander/listen at the video for well-selling Canadian Synth-Pop band Men Without Hats‘ 1982 hit ‘The Safety Dance’ — which as per Wikipedia “was also a massive success in South Africa, reaching No. 1 on the Springbok charts.”
Despite being otherwise unrelated to Willow (and predating by six whole years), it captures the style and overall feel of my next recommendation shockingly well…
Now, Willow is easily in George Lucas’ top five best-known intellectual properties.
Directed by Ron Howard —
— and produced and based on a story concept by George Lucas, Willow (much like the video for ‘Safety Dance’) is a weird movie.
It’s not necessarily a good movie, but watching it for the first time, I couldn’t help but feel it was a very endearing one. To be fair, it’s not even a bad movie, either. Mostly, it’s a very outlandish Fantasy movie that doesn’t quite manage to live up to its own ambitions.
It’s definitely worth watching once, at least.
Willow could be ungenerously described as a poor man’s The Hobbit, especially because both centre on a diminutive rustic going on an epic adventure. Though, to be fair, that’s pretty much where the similarities end.
In Willow‘s further defence, plenty of Fantasy stories can be considered a poor man’s Tolkien, given that Tolkien looms so large over the genre and there’s a lot of trashy, derivative, downright bad Fantasy stories out there — I’m looking at you, Most Dungeons & Dragons Books.
In The Hobbit, Bilbo is basically just along for the ride. In Willow, despite Willow’s overall Hobbit-ness, he is not a very Bilbo-esque hero. For one thing, he’s very much the main hero of the film and has a lot more direct influence on the plot and overall consequence than Bilbo ever does in The Hobbit.
And, if anything, Willow is less a Generic Fantasy, Dungeons & Dragons–style Hobbit (well, technically, “Halfling“; TSR got IP-lawyer’d back in the day) and given his propensity for magic, he’s really more of a Gnome, if we’re trying to describe him in D&D terms.
Which is, admittedly, neither here or there.
If Willow absolutely has to be compared to another movie, it’s probably Star Wars — and not just because they’re both the brainchildren of George Lucas. Star Wars is pretty much a Fairy Tale in space, and Willow is just straight-up a Fairy Tale. Both stories rely on the same archetypal and traditional character styles and plot devices. Not surprising, given that George Lucas is a big fan of Joseph Campbell‘s theory of myth and storytelling.
Basically, Willow is Star Wars if you replaced “space” with “Fantasy world” and “Death Star plans” with “magic baby”. The overarching story’s not very original, but it’s at least entirely adequate and a lot of the particulars of the world-building, set design, and art direction are all pretty unique and well-done.
Or just plain weird enough to be memorable.
The movie stars Warwick Davis as Willow (he’s a person, not a tree, in case that requires clarification).
Even if you think you don’t know who Warwick Davis is, you’ve probably watched at least one movie with him in it.
He was the main Ewok in Return of the Jedi and has had cameos in most of the subsequent Star Wars movies; he was in cult classic Labyrinth; he was in some of the Harry Potters, apparently (according to Wikipedia, he was something called a “Professor Flitwick” — yeah, I don’t know, either); he was in one of the Narnia movies.
Val Kilmer’s there, too, and is absolutely delightful as a character that’s pretty much a manic, hyperactive, unwashed barbarian version of Aragorn.
The funny thing is, I never actually saw Willow until I learned that Disney owns it now and went looking for it on Disney Plus. My first exposure to it was actually when my Mom read me the novelisation when I was a kid.
Full disclosure, I don’t actually remember much about it, though I do remember that I really liked it.
To the point where, as I recall, I started writing my own book that was literally just Willow with some of the details and names changed. I, uh, did that a lot as I kid.
I’d suggest you also check out the novelisation after (or even before) you watch the movie.
I’m as close to absolute certainty as is humanly possible that it’s out of print, but I was able to find some used copies of it online with minimal effort.
Again, I don’t remember much of the details, but as I recall, it does flesh out the characters, their backstories, and their motives in addition to containing scenes that didn’t make it into the final version of the film.
So, yeah, watch Willow, read Willow and keep your eyes open for J.B. Norman’s 12000% original novel Will O.
Or, you know, we could just all do the Safety Dance again:
And, of course, since your friends are no friends of mine if they don’t dance, that means we can still be friends with the Lyte Brigade:
The rest of my recommendations are here.
This week’s chapter is here:
And you can check out my social media pages and email list here:
Sign-up for my email newsletter here.